Legal Opinion
Bayusik v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 13, 1995No. 15080PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPalmer, J.
As in the companion case of Stevens v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co., 233 Conn. 460, 659 A.2d 707 (1995), which we have also decided today, the principal issue in this appeal concerns the proper application of No. 93-77 of the 1993 Public Acts (P.A. 93-77).1 The *476plaintiff, Thomas Bayusik, filed a demand for arbitration under the underinsured motorist provisions of an *477automobile liability insurance policy issued to him by the defendant Aetna Casualty and Surety Company (Aetna). The arbitration panel denied the plaintiffs claim on the ground that it had not been filed within two years from the date…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Darak v. DarakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Continental Insurance v. Cebe-HaberskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- McGlinchey v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Serrano v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Monteiro v. American Home Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hamm v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Stafford Higgins Industries, Inc. v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Berkshire Mutual Insurance v. BurbankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Andersen Consulting, LLP v. GavinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Serrano v. Aetna InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.