Legal Opinion
State of Idaho v. Shoshone-Bannock Tribes
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 10, 2006No. 04-35636PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
Idaho appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes (“Tribes”) 1 in their declaratory judgment action regarding the types of games they may offer pursuant to their tribal-state gaming Compact (“Compact”) with Idaho. The court ruled that the Tribes could operate tribal video gaming machines without renegotiating their Compact to limit the numbers of games and to require payments by the Tribes to local educational programs and schools. We affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment to the Tribes.
BACKGROUND
A. The IGRA and the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hal Roach Studios, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Richard Feiner and Company, Inc., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Sierra Club v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- In Re Indian Gaming Related Cases. Chemehuevi Indian Tribe Elk Valley Rancheria Hoopa Valley Indian Tribe Hopland Band of Pomo Indians Redding Rancheria Smith River Rancheria, and Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. The State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- City of Idaho Falls v. Home Indemnity Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1995
3Cited by18 opinions
- Tulalip Tribes of Washington v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Rincon Reservation v. SchwarzeneggerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Cachil Dehe Band of Wintun Indians v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- In re PhillipsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2013
- Knox v. STATE EX REL. OTTERIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.