Legal Opinion

Knox v. STATE EX REL. OTTER

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 2009No. 35787-2008PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Chief Justice.

This is an action seeking to have Idaho Code §§ 67-429B and 67-429C declared unconstitutional. The district court dismissed this action on the ground that the Plaintiffs lacked standing. It concluded that the relief sought would not redress the Plaintiffs’ alleged injuries. We affirm.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Because this case involves State jurisdiction over the actions of Native Americans on their reservations, we will begin by reviewing that jurisdiction.

Early decisions of the United States Supreme Court. In Worcester v. Georgia, 31 U.S. (6 Pet.) 515, 8 L.Ed.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  5. Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Evans v. Shoshone-Bannock Land Use Policy CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  2. Todd Rich v. State of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Midtown Ventures, LLC v. Capone / Capone v. City of Coeur d'AleneIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Nampa Education Association v. Nampa School District No. 131Idaho Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Linda Ciszik v. Kootenai County Bd of CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API