Legal Opinion

City of Idaho Falls v. Home Indemnity Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 12, 1995No. 20716PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILAK, Justice.

This is an insurance coverage dispute. The City of Idaho Falls (City) purchased from The Home Indemnity Company (Home) an errors and omissions liability policy which required Home to indemnify and defend the City as provided in the policy. Thereafter, the City was sued in several class action complaints involving the City’s contract with the Washington Public Power Supply System (WPPSS). Home denied coverage, and the City filed this declaratory judgment action to require Home to defend and indemnify it in the WPPSS litigation.

I

BACKGROUND AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW

The policy the City…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Transcontinental Ins. Co. v. WA. PUBLIC UTILITIES DISTRICTS'UTILITY SYSTEMWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Farm Credit Bank of Spokane v. StevensonIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Hirst v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Bonz v. SudweeksIdaho Supreme Court · 1991
  5. East Lizard Butte Water Corp. v. HowellIdaho Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Electrical Wholesale Supply Co. v. NielsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Hoyle v. Utica Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Empire Lumber Co. v. Thermal-Dynamic Towers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Albee v. JudyIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Taylor v. BrowningIdaho Supreme Court · 1996

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API