Legal Opinion
Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Rincon Reservation v. Schwarzenegger
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 20, 2010No. Nos. 08-55809, 08-55914PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILAN D. SMITH, JR., Circuit Judge:
The Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), 25 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq., provides that a state must negotiate in good faith with its resident Native American tribes to reach compacts concerning casino-style gaming on Native American lands. Defendants-Appellants/Cross-Appellees the State of California (the State) and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger (Governor Schwarzenegger) (collectively as parties to this litigation, the State) appeal the district court’s finding that, in violation of IGRA, 25 U.S.C. § 2710(d)(3)(A), the State negotiated in bad faith with…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Cherokee Nation v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- Bryan v. Itasca CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- National Labor Relations Board v. Insurance Agents' International UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Tohono O'Odham NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- New Mexico v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Pauma Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Pauma & Yuima Reservation v. CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Big Lagoon Rancheria v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Mashantucket Pequot Tribe v. Town of LedyardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.