Legal Opinion

Tulalip Tribes of Washington v. State of Washington

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 17, 2015No. 13-35464PublishedCited by 147 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

This appeal requires us to interpret a tribal-state gaming compact between the Tulalip Tribes of Washington (“Tulalip”) and the State of Washington. More specifically, at issue are electronic scratch ticket and online lottery games that use video player terminals. Tulalip asks us to force the State to amend the compact so that Tulalip can acquire additional licenses to these terminals. Citing the “most-favored tribe” clause in its compact, Tulalip argues that it is entitled to what it characterizes as the “more favorable terms” available to the Spokane Tribe…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hearst Communications v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Hearst Communications, Inc. v. Seattle Times Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State of Idaho v. Shoshone-Bannock TribesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

3Cited by147 opinions

  1. Mass. Bay Ins. Co. v. Walflor Indus., Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
  2. Dinkins v. SchinzelDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019
  3. Fernandez v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 2018
  4. In re Incretin-Based Therapies Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2015
  5. Estom Yumeka Maidu Tribe of the Enterprise Rancheria v. CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016

142 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API