Legal Opinion

Gehnert v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1998No. 97-175PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Susan Gehnert appeals from the denial of her motion to suppress evidence which was seized from her automobile.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Gehnert presents these issues for our review:

A. Whether or not there was a valid consent to search the motor vehicle in question:

1. By the possessor-defendant; or

2. By any other person.

B. If a valid consent existed, whether or not the police exceeded the scope of the search.

C. Whether or not there existed exigent circumstances justifying a warrant-less search.

FACTS

At around five o’clock in the morning on August 11,1996, Gehnert, who was employed…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Vale v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. City of Laramie v. HysongWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Gronski v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Peña v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Vassar v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Pena v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Meek v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API