Legal Opinion
Meek v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided January 9, 2002No. 00-321PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KITE, Justice.
[¶1] Michael Meek was convicted on two counts of possessing a controlled substance in violation of Wyo. Stat, Ann. § 35-7-1081 (LEXIS 1999). He appeals contending an NCIC report was an inadequate basis for a reasonable suspicion to allow an investigatory stop and consequently the subsequent search of his vehicle was unlawful, he was not appropriately advised of his Mtranda rights, and the trial court improperly allowed the information to be amended on the day of trial to allege he possessed cocaine instead of methamphetamine. We affirm.
ISSUES
[¶2] Mr. Meek presents these issues…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Marion Knuckles, Rose Smith and Raymond BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- Wilson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- O'BOYLE v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Campbell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Beaugureau v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
- Vassar v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Kenyon v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.