Legal Opinion
Peña v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided October 6, 2004No. 03-13PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
[T1] Chon Ascension Gonzales Pena (Pena) appeals his conviction for first and second degree murder. Pena argues that the district court erred in denying two separate motions to suppress and that there was insufficient evidence to support the premeditation requirement of first degree murder. Finding no reversible error, we affirm.
ISSUES
[12] Pena presents three issues for this Court's review:
I. Whether the district court erred in denying appellant's motion to suppress his statement in violation of his rights under the United States Constitution and Article 1, § 11 of the Wyoming…
2Cases cited78 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Colorado v. ConnellySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- People v. MartinezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. PittsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Pena v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Dharminder Vir Sen v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013
- Winters v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.