Legal Opinion

Vassar v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 2004No. 03-99PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VOIGT, Justice.

[11] The appellant, Peter B. Vassar, appeals from the denial of his suppression motion. The district court found that a law enforcement officer properly seized a wooden "marijuana stash box" from the appellant's automobile pursuant to the "plain view" doe-trine. The district court also upheld the officer's search of the wooden stash box (wherein the officer observed marijuana residue and smelled the odor of marijuana) and the subsequent search of the automobile's contents. We affirm.

ISSUES

[12] The issues presented in this appeal are as follows:

1. Whether a law enforcement…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. People v. JonesIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  2. OPERATION SAVE AMERICA v. City of JacksonWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Kunselman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Rideout v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Gompf v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API