Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. City of Los Angeles
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 6, 1974No. Civ. No. 43366PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, P. J.
Mandate. Petitioner Patrick M. Reynolds appeals from a summary judgment in favor of various City of Los Angeles respondents.1
The facts are stated in accordance with the rules governing review of summary judgment. (See Corwin v. Los Angeles Newspaper Service Bureau, *740Inc., 4 Cal.3d 842, 851-852 [94 Cal.Rptr. 785, 484 P.2d 953].) Thus, we must accept much that petitioner may find very hard to prove.
Petitioner was a Los Angeles police officer. On about February 18, 1972, he was served with a complaint by the police department alleging 14 counts of dereliction of duty; he was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bacich v. Board of ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Corwin v. Los Angeles Newspaper Service Bureau, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1971
- Whitfield v. RothCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fugate Ex Rel. Stroup v. FugateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- Blomquist v. ClagueNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Blomquist v. ClagueNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Fugate Ex Rel. Stroup v. FugateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- Reynolds v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978