Legal Opinion
Corwin v. Los Angeles Newspaper Service Bureau, Inc.
California Supreme Court
Decided May 17, 1971No. L.A. 29799PublishedCited by 164 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, J.
In this antitrust case, plaintiffs Harold Corwin and Allen Barr, doing business as Statewide Publication Service (Statewide), appeals from a summary judgment in favor of defendant Los Angeles Newspaper Service Bureau, Inc. (Bureau) and 40 of its member newspapers also joined as defendants. As will appear, we have concluded that upon the record presented the summary judgment was erroneously granted and should be reversed.
Statewide, a partnership formed in 1966, operates a publication service and legal advertising business dealing almost exclusively with notices of sales by…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by164 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- D'AMICO v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- John M. Dimidowich, Dba Micro Image v. Bell & HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Cornelison v. KornbluthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.