Legal Opinion

Blomquist v. Clague

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1980No. Civ. 9698PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAÚLSON, Justice.

The appellant, Daniel N. Blomquist [“Blomquist”], brought this appeal from a judgment of the Grand Forks County District Court denying his petition for a writ of mandamus. The district court ruled that Blomquist failed to exhaust his administrative remedies in connection with his “dismissal” from the City of Grand Forks Police Department and that, as a result of this failure to seek an administrative remedy, mandamus could not properly be issued. For reasons set forth in the opinion, we find that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the petition for writ of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fargo Ed. Ass'n v. PaulsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Moreno v. CairnsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Temple v. HorrallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  4. United Hospital v. HagenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Gobac v. DavisNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Slaubaugh v. SlaubaughNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Bohn v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. T.F. James Company v. VakochNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Rudnick v. City of JamestownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Mini Mart, Inc. v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API