Legal Opinion

State v. Rudder

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 23, 2008No. 05CR0568; A129931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*432EDMONDS, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for possession of a controlled substance, former ORS 475.992 (2003), amended by Or Laws 2005, ch 708, § 39, renumbered as ORS 475.840 (2005). He assigns as error the denial of his motion to suppress evidence of methamphetamine that was seized by the police from his person after he was stopped while walking to his residence. The issue on appeal is whether the search of defendant’s pocket, from which the controlled substance was seized, was permissible under Article I, section 9, of the Oregon Constitution.1 In our review, we are bound by…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. TuckerOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. RickardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  5. State v. WeemsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. RudderOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. HendonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. State v. HebrardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  4. State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. RudderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API