Legal Opinion
State v. Weems
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided October 29, 2003No. CFH99-0225; A111865PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, methamphetamine. ORS 475.992(4)(b). He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence of methamphetamine found during his arrest on an outstanding warrant. We review for errors of law, State v. Ehly, 317 Or 66, 75, 854 P2d 421 (1993), and reverse and remand.
The trial court made the following findings of fact, which are supported by evidence in the record. Ehly, 317 Or at 75. At approximately 4:00 a.m., Officer Wright observed a truck parked at a street corner with the back end of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. EhlyOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. HoskinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. MusalfCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Brundridge v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. RudderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. DavenportCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- State v. StanleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.