Legal Opinion
City of Seminole v. Mooring
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 28, 1939No. 28661PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDanner, J.
The plaintiff, D. C. Mooring, brought suit against the city of Seminole to recover damages alleged to have been sustained by reason of defendant’s negligence in failing to keep and maintain its streets in a safe and proper condition for public travel and use. In the petition it is alleged:
“That Second street in the city of Seminole, is, and was at all times hereinafter mentioned, an open, public highway extending through said city, and was an important and frequently traveled way.
“That said highway and said street is and was at all times hereinafter mentioned, under the control and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- City of Phoenix v. MayfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1933
- Willis v. . New BernSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- City of Oklahoma City v. MeyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1896
- The Town of Norman v. TeelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Smith v. SharpIdaho Supreme Court · 1960
- Mix v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- Leslie v. HammerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. GrahamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Barrington v. HembreeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.