Legal Opinion

Town of Westport v. City of Norwalk

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided August 20, 1974PublishedCited by 58 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.

In June of 1972, the defendant Flower Estates at Cranbury, Inc., (hereinafter called Flower Estates) made application to the planning and zoning commission of the city of Nor-walk (hereinafter called the commission) for approval of a plan for a fifty-lot subdivision of a thirty-acre tract of unimproved land. The land, situated entirely in Norwalk, is bounded on the west by Wolf pit Avenue, on the north by Par trick Avenue and on the east by Cranbury Road; Cranbury Road forms a boundary between Norwalk and West-port. Tbe plaintiffs comprise tbe town of West-port, the Norwalk-Westport Cranbury…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Hartford Electric Light Co. v. Water Resources CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  2. State v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  3. Hurlbut v. LemelinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  4. Kutcher v. Town Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  5. Forest Construction Co. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by58 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Freedom of Information CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Bridgeport Hospital v. Commission on Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Connecticut State Medical Society v. Connecticut Board of ExaminersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Lieberman v. State Board of Labor RelationsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  5. Levinson v. Connecticut Board of Chiropractic ExaminersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API