Legal Opinion

People v. Brasier

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1996PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gerald Sheindlin, J.

Having completed his prison term for a conviction of two sexual offenses, the defendant was referred to this court for a determination as to the risk level to be assigned pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.). The defendant appeared and an attorney was assigned to represent him at the hearing. The court then ordered the de*338fendant to return in three days for the hearing. The defendant failed to appear on the adjourn date. The court is thus presented with an issue of first impression under the new statute, to wit:…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. CorleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Darvin M. v. JacobsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. People v. RossNew York Supreme Court · 1996
  5. People v. RecorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. BrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. People v. SalaamNew York Supreme Court · 1997
  3. People v. JimenezNew York Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. ReidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  5. People v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API