Legal Opinion
Darvin M. v. Jacobs
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 5, 1987PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The judgment of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
Petitioner brought a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to prohibit respondents from allowing New York City Department of Probation attorneys to participate as counsel in a probation revocation proceeding brought against him. The Appellate Division properly denied the requested relief. It cannot be said that respondent New York City Department of Probation is clearly acting "in excess of its authorized powers” *959(Matter of Jacobs v Altman, 69 NY2d 733, 734; see, Matter of State of New…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- MATTER OF STATE OF NY v. KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Schumer v. HoltzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Jacobs v. AltmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
3Cited by36 opinions
- People v. StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- Della Pietra v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. RuffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. RecorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. RecorNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.