People v. Parker
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
*138OPINION OF THE COURT
Wachtler, J.
The question on this appeal is whether a finding that a criminal defendant has received actual notice of the date for trial and has nonetheless voluntarily failed to appear is sufficient, as a matter of law, to permit the court to proceed to try the defendant in absentia. The courts below held this finding sufficient to establish an implicit relinquishment of a defendant’s right to be present at trial. We disagree and reverse.
In February, 1977 defendant was indicted for two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law, §…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by412 opinions
- People v. HorneNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- People v. VargasNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. LuperonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- People v. WorleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. GoldsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
407 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.