Legal Opinion

People v. Parker

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 7, 1982PublishedCited by 412 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*138OPINION OF THE COURT

Wachtler, J.

The question on this appeal is whether a finding that a criminal defendant has received actual notice of the date for trial and has nonetheless voluntarily failed to appear is sufficient, as a matter of law, to permit the court to proceed to try the defendant in absentia. The courts below held this finding sufficient to establish an implicit relinquishment of a defendant’s right to be present at trial. We disagree and reverse.

In February, 1977 defendant was indicted for two counts of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law, §…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  5. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by412 opinions

  1. People v. HorneNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. People v. VargasNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. People v. LuperonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People v. WorleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. People v. GoldsteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2009

407 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API