Legal Opinion
People v. Ross
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 2, 1996PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold Tompkins, J.
The nature of the hearing required under New York State’s Sex Offender Registration Act (Correction Law § 168 et seq.) is the issue before this court. It arises in the context of defendant James Ross’ challenge to the Board of Examiners’ recommendation that Mr. Ross be classified as a level-three sex offender. This is the first case interpreting New York’s new Sex Offender Registration Act.
the sex offender statute
Article 6-C of the Correction Law (§§ 168 — 168-v [L 1995, ch 192]) was adopted on July 25, 1995 and became effective on *309January 26, 1996. This…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- People v. PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Doe v. PatakiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- People v. MinardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. EsquivelNew York Supreme Court · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- State v. CookOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2000
- State Ex Rel. Olivieri v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- Doe v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.