Legal Opinion
People v. Reid
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 13, 2008PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The People met their burden of establishing, by clear and convincing evidence, risk factors bearing a sufficient total point score to support a level three sex offender adjudication. Defendant’s arguments concerning the risk factors of accep*339tance of responsibility and release without supervision are unavailing (see People v Lewis, 37 AD3d 689, 690 [2007], Iv denied 8 NY3d 814 [2007]), and his arguments concerning a third risk factor are improperly raised for the first time on appeal (CPLR 4017, 5501 [a] [3]; Correction Law § 168-n [3] [SORA appeals governed by applicable CPLR provisions];…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. GuamanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. PorterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. BrasierNew York Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1998
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. ArrahmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. ReidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. AlmeidaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
- People v. CampbellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019
- People v. TorresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011