Zager v. F. W. Woolworth Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of respondent corporation in an action brought against it by appellant for damages for personal injuries resulting from the application by her to her face and hands of a certain freckle cream which she purchased from respondent.
The first amended complaint contained three causes of action, the first upon the implied warranty arising from the sale of the cream that it was suitable for the purposes for which it was required and would be of merchantable quality and character; the second upon an express warranty that the cream was pure and wholesome and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kienlen v. HoltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Depuy v. ShayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Armbrust v. SouthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
3Cited by14 opinions
- Magee v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Nina Merrill v. Beaute Vues Corporation, a Corporation and Waval Thermal Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Crotty v. Shartenberg's-New Haven, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- Esborg v. Bailey Drug Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
- Friedman v. Merck & Co.California Court of Appeal · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.