Nina Merrill v. Beaute Vues Corporation, a Corporation and Waval Thermal Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PICKETT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff, Nina Merrill, purchased a package of Nutri-Tonic permanent, a hair waving product, manufactured by the defendant Waval Thermal Company, a corporation, and marketed by the defendant Beaute Vues Corporation, a corporation. The product is a solution containing ammonium thioglycolate, a substance which softens human hair so that it can be shaped, and is similar to the many brands presently on the market, It is used to curl and beautify women’s hair and is commonly known as “home permanent”. Defendants’ product was applied to plaintiff’s hair according to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bianchi v. Denholm & McKay Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Worley v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
- Bennett v. Pilot Products Co., Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
- Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. NagleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- John N. Fortier and Linda M. Fortier v. Dona Anna Plaza Partners, James A. Peterson, Peterson Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. And Cosmair, Inc. v. Edd Pruitt and Marjorie Ann PruittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Carmichael v. ReitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Sterling Drug, Inc., a Corporation v. Maxine F. CornishCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Krug v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.