Esborg v. Bailey Drug Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
This is a products liability case. The defendants, Bailey Drug Company, the retailer, and Nestle-Lemur Company, the manufacturer, of the product involved, are appealing from an adverse judgment.
Trial of the action was had before the court, sitting without a jury. The appeal is upon a short record (Rule on Appeal 34 (3)), and contains only the testimony of the plaintiff wife (hereafter referred to as plaintiff) and two medical witnesses, one called by plaintiff and one by defendants.
The record before us does not indicate that pretrial interrogatories, and the answers thereto, contained in the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mazetti v. Armour & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Bianchi v. Denholm & McKay Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Garratt v. DaileyWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Worley v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
- Nina Merrill v. Beaute Vues Corporation, a Corporation and Waval Thermal Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. And Cosmair, Inc. v. Edd Pruitt and Marjorie Ann PruittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
- Greeno v. Clark Equipment CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1965
- Robert D. Putman v. Erie City Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
- Payne v. Soft Sheen Products, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.