Legal Opinion
Friedman v. Merck & Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 26, 2003No. B155272PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
131 Cal.Rptr.2d 885 (2003)
107 Cal.App.4th 454
Jerold Daniel FRIEDMAN, Plaintiff and Appellant,
v.
MERCK & CO., Inc. et al. Defendants and Respondents.
No. B155272.
Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Five.
March 26, 2003.
Review Denied June 11, 2003.[*]
Certiorari Denied May 19, 2003.
Myer Law Firm and Scott D. Myer, Los Angeles, for Plaintiff and Appellant.
Drinker Biddle & Reath, Charles F. Preuss, Alan J. Lazarus, San Francisco, and Jonathan M. Rolbin for Defendants and Respondents.
Certiorari Denied May 19, 2003. See 123 S.Ct. 2078.
TURNER, P.J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Jerold Daniel Friedman,…
2Cases cited92 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
87 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Hydro-Mill Co. v. Hayward, Tilton & Rolapp Insurance Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Bock v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Ovando v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Johnson v. McPheeIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
- Alice Mayall v. USA Water Polo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.