Legal Opinion
Crotty v. Shartenberg's-New Haven, Inc.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 28, 1960PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained in consequence of a breach of an implied warranty. The court directed a verdict for the defendant and thereafter denied the plaintiff’s motion to set it aside. The plaintiff has appealed.
Prom the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, the jury could have found the following facts: The plaintiff asked the sales girl at the cosmetic counter in the defendant’s store for a good hair remover, without specifying any brand. The clerk sold her a hair remover called Nudit,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ryan v. Progressive Grocery Stores, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Bianchi v. Denholm & McKay Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Worley v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1952
- Nina Merrill v. Beaute Vues Corporation, a Corporation and Waval Thermal Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Flynn v. Bedell Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Davis v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. And Cosmair, Inc. v. Edd Pruitt and Marjorie Ann PruittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Carmichael v. ReitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Rossignol v. Danbury School of Aeronautics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Hamon v. DiglianiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.