Legal Opinion
Depuy v. Shay
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 14, 1932No. Docket No. 11PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
The plaintiff and her husband, C. P. DePuy, on December 30, 1925, purchased an Overland automobile under a contract which reserved title in the vendor until fully paid for, and which was signed by the plaintiff and her husband as purchasers. The purchase price was fully paid on February 13, 1926, and apparently the necessary papers were signed for a transfer of ownership, for the court found, and the finding is not attacked, “that a new pink certificate of ownership was issued on the first day of March, 1926, by the Motor Vehicle Division of the State of California, showing C. F. DePuy to be…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bias v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. DallasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Hammond v. HazardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Jolly v. McCoyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sayles v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Staley v. McClurkenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Zager v. F. W. Woolworth Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
- Helmuth v. FrameCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- McCoy v. Northwestern Casualty & Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.