Constanti v. Barovic
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.
This is a suit in equity, in which the plaintiffs allege a partnership with the defendants, and pray for an accounting of the business and division of the partnership property.
In their amended complaint, plaintiffs allege that, September 29, 1936, in pursuance of a previous oral agreement, they entered into a written copartnership contract to purchase and operate the Riviera theater in Tacoma, the Liberty and Roxy theaters in Puyallup, and the Riviera theater in Sumner; that, immediately after the execution of the articles of the copartnership, the defendant Michael Barovic begun a studied…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Nicholson v. KilburyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Causten v. BarnetteWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Z. C. Miles Co. v. GordonWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Yatsuyanagi v. ShimamuraWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Bridgman v. WinsnessUtah Supreme Court · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Vance v. IngramWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Eder v. ReddickWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Stipcich v. MarinovichWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Purdy & Whitfield v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Tripp v. ChubbArizona Supreme Court · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.