Bridgman v. Winsness
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District; T. D. Lewis, Judge. Action by Michael J. Bridgman, administrator of William Pender, against George Winsness, administrator of Fred Roberts. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCARTT, C. J.
William Pender and James Pender, father and son, began the foundry business as partners about the fall of 1890, under the name of “Murray Iron Foundry, William Pen-*385der & Son.’ ’ It is claimed by appellant — and there is evidence in the record which tends to support his contention —that on or about December 3, 1894, James Pender sold his interest in the business to his father, William Pender, and that the partnership was thereby dissolved. The record shows that from this time on, until the departure in the, early part of 1897 of William on his mission, which took him from the State for aboi’"'…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bopp v. FoxIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
- Haug v. HaugIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
- Robbins v. LaswellIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
- Kelleher v. TisdaleIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
- Morse v. RichmondAppellate Court of Illinois · 1880
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Estate of ThorntonWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Nicholson v. KilburyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Gaspar v. BuckinghamMontana Supreme Court · 1944
- Constanti v. BarovicWashington Supreme Court · 1939
- Latham v. HennesseyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.