Legal Opinion
Max R. Kargman v. Thomas A. Sullivan
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided August 22, 1978No. 77-1559PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge.
We held last year that the plaintiffs, who were owners of apartments subsidized and financed under § 221(d)(3) of the National Housing Act, 12 U.S.C. § 17157(d)(3), were not immune by virtue of the Supremacy Clause from Boston rent control during certain years in 1970. Kargman v. Sullivan, 552 F.2d 2 (1st Cir. 1977). We concluded that,
“the [Supreme] Court would deem applicable, at least in the absence of a clear position by HUD, the principle of preferring cooperation to that of ousting the local regulatory scheme.”
Id. at 13. 1 Since the district court had not…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States Trust Co. of NY v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Sinking-Fund CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- City of El Paso v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Oceanside Mobilehome Park Owners' Ass'n v. City of OceansideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Max R. Kargman v. Thomas A. Sullivan, Sarah Wean, Intervenors, (Two Cases.)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Ope Shipping, Ltd. v. Underwriters at LloydsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- Duffy v. ClippingerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Miller v. Cudahy Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.