Legal Opinion
Miller v. Cudahy Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided March 3, 1987No. Civ. A. 77-1212PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
THEIS, District Judge.
Jarndyce and Jarndyce drones on. This scarecrow of a suit has, in course of time, become so complicated that no man alive knows what it means. The parties to it understand it least; but it has been observed that no two Chancery lawyers can talk about it for five minutes without coming to a total disagreement as to all the premises. Innumerable children have been born into the cause; innumerable young people have married into it; innumerable old people have died out of it. Scores of persons have deliriously found themselves made parties in Jarndyce and…
2Cases cited70 opinions
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Christiansburg Garment Co. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Runyon v. McCrarySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- American Motorists Insurance v. General Host Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 1987
- Miller v. Cudahy Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Federated Mutual Insurance v. Botkin Grain Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
- Ortega v. IBP, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1995
- Sunshine Jr. Stores, Inc. v. STATE, DERDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.