Legal Opinion
Max R. Kargman v. Thomas A. Sullivan, Sarah Wean, Intervenors, (Two Cases.)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided December 26, 1978No. 78-1174, 78-1175PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEVIN H. CAMPBELL, Circuit Judge.
This is a dispute over attorneys’ fees for work done before the district and appellate courts in Kargman v. Sullivan, 552 F.2d 2 (1st Cir. 1977); 582 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1978). The Kargman brothers, plaintiffs below, appeal from a district court award of $26,-491.58 made under the common fund doctrine and divided between Mr. Mark Stern, private counsel for Roberta Kracov, et al., defendant-intervenors, and Greater Boston Legal Services for the work of Mr. Brian Olmstead, counsel for Sarah Wean, et al., defendant-intervenors. Stern and Olm-stead also appeal,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Hall v. ColeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Dolores J. Copeland, Individually and on Behalf of the Class of All Others Similarly Situated v. F. Ray Marshall, Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- William Weinberger v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- George E. Miles v. George Sampson, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Linda L. Hebert v. Cordelia Wicklund, D/B/A Lake FarmCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Robert H. CALHOUN, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. ACME CLEVELAND CORPORATION and the Cleveland Twist Drill Company, Defendants, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.