Legal Opinion
Oceanside Mobilehome Park Owners' Ass'n v. City of Oceanside
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 27, 1984No. Civ. 28680PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WORK, J.
The City of Oceanside appeals an order preliminarily enjoining it from applying and enforcing its mobilehome park rent control ordinance. The trial court held the ordinance facially unconstitutional because it believed the formula for setting initial rents and providing for adjustments fails to consider the property’s fair market value and existing general market conditions and deprives park owners of a fair rate of return on their property. The city also challenges the trial court’s finding other provisions facially invalid, but alternatively argues they are of subordinate…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Manufactured Housing Communities v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 2000
- Galland v. City of ClovisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Sierra Lake Reserve v. The City of Rocklin the Rocklin Mobile Home Rent Review Commission Carlos Urrutia Rusty Selix Rudolf Michaels George ParasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Los Altos El Granada Investors v. City of CapitolaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.