Cabot v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LYDON, Senior Judge:
The progress of this litigation as a whole has been marked by plaintiffs’ delay in complying, or failure to comply, with the court’s orders. Discovery, which closed on September 15, 1995, continues to be a source of contention between the parties. This order addresses defendant’s February 28,1996 Motion to Compel Production of Documents Withheld Under Claims of Attorney-Client Privilege or the Attorney Work Product Doctrine, and defendant’s April 5, 1996 Motion for Suspension of Proceedings. Defendant seeks production of approximately 705 documents withheld by…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated September 15, 1983 Marc Rich & Co. A.G., Intervenor-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Energy Capital Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Sparton Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- B.E. Meyers & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- AAB Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.