Legal Opinion

Cabot v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided April 15, 1996No. Nos. 92-315T, 92-457TPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LYDON, Senior Judge:

The progress of this litigation as a whole has been marked by plaintiffs’ delay in complying, or failure to comply, with the court’s orders. Discovery, which closed on September 15, 1995, continues to be a source of contention between the parties. This order addresses defendant’s February 28,1996 Motion to Compel Production of Documents Withheld Under Claims of Attorney-Client Privilege or the Attorney Work Product Doctrine, and defendant’s April 5, 1996 Motion for Suspension of Proceedings. Defendant seeks production of approximately 705 documents withheld by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
  5. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated September 15, 1983 Marc Rich & Co. A.G., Intervenor-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Energy Capital Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
  3. Sparton Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
  4. B.E. Meyers & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  5. AAB Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API