Legal Opinion
AAB Joint Venture v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 28, 2007No. Nos. 04-1719 C, No. 05-114 C, No. 05-1172 C, No. 06-49 CPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
DAMICH, Chief Judge.
Before the Court in this government contract case is Plaintiffs Motion for Order *434Compelling Discovery with Respect to Defendant’s Responses to Plaintiffs Requests for Production of Documents in Case Nos. 04-1719C, 04-1792C1 and 05-144C. For the reasons set forth below Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART.
I. Background
AAB entered into a contract with the government on June 5, 2001, to design and construct a storage and logistics base in Elad, Israel for use by the Israeli Defense Force (“IDF”). Am. Compl. in Case No. 04-1719, U 4, 6.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Goodman v. Praxair Services, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
- Eden Isle Marina, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Evergreen Trading, LLC ex rel. GN Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Jicarilla Apache Nation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.