Legal Opinion

In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated September 15, 1983 Marc Rich & Co. A.G., Intervenor-Appellant v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 27, 1984No. 18-3336PublishedCited by 297 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEARSE, Circuit Judge:

Intervenor Marc Rich & Co. A.G. (“AG”) appeals from so much of an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Robert L. Carter, Judge, as denied a motion to quash a September 15, 1983 grand jury subpoena duces tecum (“1983 Subpoena”) served on AG’s former counsel, Proskauer, Rose, Goetz & Mendelsohn (“Proskauer”). Pros-kauer and AG claimed that many of the documents sought were privileged, either as attorney’s work product or as attorney-client confidences. The district court held that the documents at issue on this appeal were not…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by297 opinions

  1. United States v. ZolinSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Bank Brussels Lambert v. Fiddler Gonzalez & RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. Haines v. Liggett Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. In Re Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. Martin SchwimmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989

292 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API