B.E. Meyers & Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge:
This is an action for patent infringement brought by plaintiffs, B.E. Meyers & Co. and Brad E. Meyers, against the defendant, the United States, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498 (1994). Pending are the motions for a protective order on the basis of the joint-defense privilege by defendant and Insight Technology, a nonparty to this litigation. The defendant and Insight seek to protect communications, between attorneys for the United States and Insight, the disclosure of which would allegedly violate either the attorney-client privilege or work-product protection. Based on…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1950
- Haines v. Liggett Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Robert McPartlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
- United States v. Martin SchwimmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Nidec Corp. v. Victor Co. of JapanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
- Evergreen Trading, LLC ex rel. GN Investments, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Energy Capital Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- Sparton Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Capital Properties, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.