Legal Opinion
Hughes Tool Co. v. Max Hinrichs Seed Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 17, 1980No. Civ. 58197PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT. *
Complaint on a note. Cross-complaint on product liability and implied warranty.
In January 1971 Hughes Tool Company (Hughes) sold a helicopter and certain agricultural spray equipment to a family partnership doing business in the State of Washington as Max Hinrichs Seed Company (Hinrichs). The partnership made a small down payment and executed a promissory note for the balance of the purchase price. The terms of the note called for payment of $43,000 principal and $9,400 interest on the declining unpaid balance. The note and accompanying chattel mortgage were signed on…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Vandermark v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
- Union Sugar Co. v. Hollister Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Hansen v. CovellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Sommer v. MartinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Boyd v. Oscar Fisher Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
- Triad Data Services, Inc. v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1984
- Fox v. Peck Iron and Metal Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 1982
- Siligo v. CastellucciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- In Re RBS Industries, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.