Siligo v. Castellucci
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ELIA, J.
In an action arising from the sale of a business the trial court rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff-seller (Siligo) and against the defendant-buyer (Castellucci). The judgment awarded Siligo limited contractual attorney fees by denying the bulk of fees which were apportioned to defense of a cross-complaint for fraud; it also ordered some of the attorney fees subject to a contractual provision limiting recovery of a deficiency after foreclosure; it finally ordered judicial foreclosure of a parcel of real property giving Castellucci deficiency judgment credit for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Xuereb v. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- Stout v. TurneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Wagner v. BensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Lerner v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- IMO Development Corp. v. Dow Corning Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gil v. MansanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Estate of PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Calvo Fisher & Jacob LLP v. LujanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Ebrahimpour v. Pasco CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Gil v. MansanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.