Legal Opinion

Siligo v. Castellucci

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 10, 1994No. H010061PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ELIA, J.

In an action arising from the sale of a business the trial court rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff-seller (Siligo) and against the defendant-buyer (Castellucci). The judgment awarded Siligo limited contractual attorney fees by denying the bulk of fees which were apportioned to defense of a cross-complaint for fraud; it also ordered some of the attorney fees subject to a contractual provision limiting recovery of a deficiency after foreclosure; it finally ordered judicial foreclosure of a parcel of real property giving Castellucci deficiency judgment credit for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Xuereb v. Marcus & Millichap, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Stout v. TurneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Wagner v. BensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Lerner v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  5. IMO Development Corp. v. Dow Corning Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Gil v. MansanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Estate of PetersenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. Calvo Fisher & Jacob LLP v. LujanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Ebrahimpour v. Pasco CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Gil v. MansanoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API