Legal Opinion
Boyd v. Oscar Fisher Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 10, 1989No. H002678PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AGLIANO, P. J.
1. Introduction
Plaintiff Benton Boyd, Jr., doing business as Boyd’s Photographic Processing Equipment Sales (dealer) appeals from a postjudgment order awarding defendant Oscar Fisher Company, Inc. (manufacturer) attorney fees of $38,730, prejudgment interest of 7 percent from the delinquent date of a number of invoices amounting to $8,652.89, and costs amounting to $17,876.65. Dealer brought this action alleging manufacturer had unjustifiably terminated an exclusive dealership agreement. Manufacturer cross-complained based on unpaid invoices. The jury awarded manufacturer…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Stout v. TurneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Wagner v. BensonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Gerdlund v. Electronic Dispensers InternationalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Myers Building Industries, Ltd. v. Interface Technology, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Mountain Air Enters., LLC v. Sundowner Towers, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Lerner v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Comark Merchandising, Incorporated, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Highland Group, Incorporated, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- United States ex rel. Reed v. CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.