Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Paul
California Court of Appeal
Decided October 29, 1985No. B001732PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
Appellant Patricia G. Paul (Wife) appeals from an order denying her an increase in spousal support payments from respondent Donald D. Paul (Husband), and from a denial of a motion for new trial.
Because the trial court abused its discretion, the judgment is reversed and the matter remanded.
Procedural and Factual Background
Wife and Husband were divorced in late 1978 after a marriage of over 17 years. The November 6, 1978, interlocutory judgment dissolving the marriage was based on a “marital settlement agreement” between the parties.
The judgment provided for monthly child…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re Marriage of ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re Marriage of EpsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Hall v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Lippman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cheriton v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- In Re Marriage of IbertiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Diener v. McBeth (In Re Diener)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Jones v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- In Re Marriage of BukatyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.