In Re Marriage of Epstein
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
— In this marital dissolution proceeding both husband and wife challenge various rulings of the trial court. We state briefly our conclusions with respect to the issues raised.
First, we explain that although a spouse is generally not entitled to reimbursement for separate funds utilized to meet community obligations, that rule does not apply to expenditures subsequent to separation. Accordingly, husband may claim reimbursement for sums expended after separation to preserve and maintain the family residence, unless such sums were paid to fulfill husband’s support…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FonsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- In Re Marriage of StenquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- See v. SeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Weinberg v. WeinbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- In Re Marriage of LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Cheriton v. FraserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Falcone v. FykeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- In Re Marriage of FabianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re Marriage of WattsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.