Jones v. Jones
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTH, P. J.
I
This appeal raises the following question of first impression: May a child who has reached the age of majority and who is not physically or mentally disabled bring an action against her father to compel him to pay for her college education? Because we find that neither the relevant California statutes nor case law precedent can now be read so as to impose such an obligation upon a parent, we affirm the trial court’s order sustaining without leave to amend the demurrer to the complaint.
Plaintiff reached the age of majority when she turned 18 years old on January 25, 1985.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Paxton v. PaxtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Stockton Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Radich v. KrulyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Bryant v. SwoapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bach v. McNelisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- Seixas v. Booth (In Re Seixas)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Crews v. Willows Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Pierce v. Pierce (In Re Pierce)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. California · 1988
- Cohen v. CohenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.