Legal Opinion
in the Interest of A.J.L. and C.R.L., Children
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)
Decided April 29, 2004No. 02-03-00040-CVPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TERRIE LIVINGSTON, Justice.
Appellant Michelle L. appeals the trial court’s order terminating her parental rights to her children, A.J.L. and C.R.L. In two points, she complains that: (1) the trial court erred by allowing the attorneys for respondent, Donald “Bobby” Wall, and intervenors, Jose and Yolinda Trevino, to present closing arguments to the jury; and (2) the trial court abused its discretion by allowing expert opinions when there were no grounds for admissibility under a Daubert/Robinson analysis or because the opinions were based upon hearsay. In three supplemental points,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- In the Interest of J.F.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Taylor v. Texas Department of Protective & Regulatory Services, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2005
- In the Interest of T.N.F.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2006
- Reynolds v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
- Toshiba MacHine Co. v. SPM Flow Control, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- In the Interest of A.M.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.