Legal Opinion
City of Anaheim v. METRO. WATER DIST. OF S. CAL.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 12, 1978No. Civ. 19445PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MERRIAM, J. *
This is an appeal from a judgment granting declaratory relief and money judgment. A dispute arose between appellant and respondent concerning liability for the costs of relocating respondent’s pipelines in two distinct areas. The pipeline relocation became necessary when appellant constructed an undercrossing for Lewis Street under the Atchison-Topeka and Santa Fe Railway right of way. The two disputed areas include (1) the portion of Lewis Street extending from the railway right of way south to Cerritos Avenue and (2) the actual undercrossing on the railway right of way.
Ap…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Colegrove Water Co. v. City of HollywoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Elliott v. McCombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Willard v. First Church of Christ, ScientistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Anderson v. WillsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- Balestra v. ButtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Salvaty v. Falcon Cable TelevisionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- 14 Collier bankr.cas.2d 289, Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,907 in Re John J. Gulino and Patricia A. Gulino, Debtors. William B. Grover v. John J. Gulino, Jr. And Patricia Anne GulinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- City of Los Angeles v. Metropolitan Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Grover v. GulinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Aghaeepour v. City of Loma Linda CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.