Legal Opinion

Grover v. Gulino

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 30, 1985No. 85-1838PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BEEZER, Circuit Judge:

This appeal raises the question of whether recordation by the transferees of a grant deed to real property within 90 days of the Chapter YII petition filing by the debtors-transferors resulted in a preferential transfer under 11 U.S.C. § 547. The bankruptcy court ruled that, as the sale agreement was concluded prior to the 90 day period, recordation of the deed within that period was not on account of an antecedent debt. The district court affirmed that ruling. We affirm on the different ground that recordation of the deed did not constitute a transfer within the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  2. Corn Exchange National Bank & Trust Co. v. KlauderSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. In Re Wadsworth Building Components, Inc., Debtor, Gary L. McClendon Trustee v. Cal-Wood DoorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  4. City of Las Vegas v. Clark CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Harbor National Bank of Boston v. Sid Kumins, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. 14 Collier bankr.cas.2d 289, Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,907 in Re John J. Gulino and Patricia A. Gulino, Debtors. William B. Grover v. John J. Gulino, Jr. And Patricia Anne GulinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API