Legal Opinion

Colegrove Water Co. v. City of Hollywood

California Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1907No. L.A. No. 1799PublishedCited by 54 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

This action, brought to obtain an injunction restraining the defendants, the city of Hollywood and its superintendent of streets, from interfering with plaintiff in its efforts to lay pipes across two streets of said city, resulted in a judgment granting to plaintiff the relief sought.

A motion for a new trial, made by the defendants enjoined, was denied. Said defendants appeal from the judgment and from the order denying their motion for a new trial.

The general nature of the case is shown by the following facts found by the court: The plaintiff is a corporation organized under the laws of the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. . the City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. McDougald v. HuletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Winslow v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Allen v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  5. Montgomery v. Santa Ana Westminster Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. City of Pasadena v. California-Michigan Land & Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Hill Farm, Inc. v. Hill CountyTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State Ex. Rel. York v. B. of C. Com'rsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Paiva v. NicholsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API