Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Willson

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 22, 1920No. Civ. No. 2683PublishedCited by 24 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

Defendant on the judgment-roll alone, appeals from an adverse judgment. While this appeal was pending, the original plaintiff and respondent, John P. Clark, died, and the administrator of his estate, Arthur Anderson, was substituted in the suit. Notwithstanding this substitution, we shall, for convenience, refer to the original plaintiff, Clark, as the plaintiff in the action and the respondent on this appeal.

From the findings it appears that on March 5, 1908, the plaintiff, John P. Clark, and Thomas H. Thompson, defendant’s grantor, entered into a written contract whereby Thompson, as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hanson v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Quarg v. ScherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Fair v. StevenotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Brimmer v. SalisburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Backman v. ParkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. City of Manhattan Beach v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Alfaro v. Community Housing Improvement System & Planning Assn., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. People v. ThompsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Field-Escandon v. DeMannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Moakley v. Los Angeles Pacific Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API