Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Copeland

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 26, 2000No. 94758PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RAPP, P.J.

1 1 The trial court plaintiff, Frank Gibson ("Gibson"), appeals from an order dismissing his small claims action against the trial court defendants, Melvin Copeland, Sheriff ("Copeland") and John Doe ("Doe").

I. Status of Appeal

T2 The appeal has been filed under the accelerated procedures applicable to orders involving summary judgment, orders dismissing for failure to state a claim, and orders dismissing for lack of jurisdiction. Okla. Sup.Ct. R. 1.36, 12 0.8. Supp.1999, ch. 15, app. Here the dismissal occurred because of the trial court's ruling that Gibson failed to file a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Neil Acquisition, L.L.C. v. Wingrod Investment Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Medina v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  3. Shanbour v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Lee Wayne Company, Inc. v. PruittCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
  5. Nestle Food Co. v. CrewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Peterson v. LampertCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  2. SWEETEN v. LAWSONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
  3. Winterhalder v. Burggraf Restoration, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2011
  4. Arndt v. Medicine Park City ofDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2019
  5. Dodson v. ReedDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API